Adam Schiff’s Kangaroo court heard testimony from Ambassador Volker yesterday, and though the Democrats are attempting to spin his testimony as somehow damning to Trump, there is a common thread throughout his testimony, mostly within his opening statement that really sheds light into what this Ukraine business is really all about. In Volker’s opening statement he says “In hindsight, I now understand that others saw the idea of investigating possible corruption involving the Ukrainian company, ‘Burisma,’ as equivalent to investigating former Vice President Biden,”. Multiple times throughout the testimony yesterday the witnesses expressed that Burisma is known as a corrupt company, so what are the American people supposed to think when an ambassador states that investigating a corrupt company like Burisma is equivalent to investigating former Vice President Biden?
This entire investigation is supposed to be based on the idea that Donald Trump is a big bad man because he asked a foreign government to investigate his political opponent, we’ve also been told by the Democrats and their lap dogs in the media that when Biden demanded a prosecutor be fired in a foreign country it was ok because they were fighting corruption in a country that is known for corruption. Can someone please explain to me how we are supposed to ignore that this entire investigation his based on us needing to draw a direct correlation to a corrupt Ukrainian energy company and the Vice President of the United States, a correlation that Democrats not only have not challenged, but is the basis of their prosecution, and we are supposed to ignore that part and believe that Donald Trump is the bad person in this scenario?
The Democrats entire case is built on these fundamental facts:
1. Donald Trump asked Ukraine to investigate Burisma
2. Donald Trump engaged in a quid pro quo involving the investigation of Burisma
3. Investigating Burisma is the same as investigating Joe Biden
Those are the main pillars of the Democrat’s case against President Trump. Their claim that suggesting Vice President Biden is somehow corrupt is a right-wing conspiracy, that Joe Biden had no connection to Burisma regardless of his son being on their board, remember, when this news broke Biden was quick to tell everyone that he and his son never discussed his work for Burisma, yet for their prosecution to work you have to inextricably connect Joe Biden to Burisma. Which are we supposed to believe?
Comments (0)
To leave or reply to comments, please download free Podbean or
No Comments
To leave or reply to comments,
please download free Podbean App.